Are you in VIC? If not, please change below.

In your state, you are required to confirm you wish to access this information. Please enter 'QLD' or 'WA' in the field below to continue.

No thanks

Zimmer Durom Hip Replacement Class Action

Older couple on the coast | Shine Lawyers

Shine lawyers is investigating a class action against Zimmer Australia and Zimmer GMBH in relation to the Zimmer Durom Resurfacing system and the Zimmer Durom/Metasul Total Hip system. The class action will seek compensation for individuals that have suffered complications with the device since their hip replacement.

Our offer to you

  • Obligation-free consultation to assess your case confidentially

  • Claim assessment process where we will explain all of the options available to you

  • We can come to you - if you can't make it into the office we're more than happy to come to you

  • No Win No Fee arrangement

Common questions about Zimmer Durom Hip Replacement Class Action

The class action will assert that the Zimmer Durom Resurfacing system and the Zimmer Durom/Metasul Total Hip system were not of merchantable quality, were not fit for their intended purpose and that they were defective and that Zimmer has been negligent.

About the Zimmer Durom implants

The Zimmer Durom implants are metal-on-metal hip replacement systems used in two types of hip replacement, namely hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. The Zimmer Durom Hip Resurfacing System was designed for hip resurfacing procedures in which the patient’s femoral head is ‘resurfaced” with a metal cap and an acetabular cup is inserted into the patient’s acetabulum (in the pelvis).

The Zimmer Durom Resurfacing therefore consisted of two components: an acetabular cup and a femoral resurfacing component.

Since the Zimmer Durom hip systems were released onto the Australian market in 2003, there have been many reported issues with the devices.

The reported issues include, but are not limited to:

  • cup loosening
  • metal wear
  • persistent pain and discomfort
  • femoral neck fracture
  • hip dislocation.

On 30 October 2012 the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) published online that Zimmer had cancelled the Durom acetabular component from the Australian Therapeutic Goods Registry due to the higher than acceptable revision rates.

In 2012 the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry (NJRR) identified the Zimmer Durom Hip Resurfacing System as having the following cumulative revision rates of:

  • 7.5% revision rate at 5 years; and
  • 9.3% revision rate at 7 years.

The most recent NJRR Report published in October 2013 identified the Zimmer Durom/Metasul Total Hip system as having cumulative revision rates of:

  • 7.6% revision rate at 5 years; and
  • 9 % revision rate at 7 years.

In the same report, the Alloclassic/Durom was identified as having a higher than anticipated cumulative revision rates of:

  • 7.5% revision rate of individual total conventional hip at 5 years; and
  • 7.1% revision of primary total conventional hip replacement with cementless fixation at 5 years.

According to the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE guidelines) revision that occurs within ten years of implantation of a hip replacement is widely accepted to be early revision.

A number of lawsuits have been filed in the United States and Canada in relation to the Zimmer Durom hip systems.
Some of these cases have settled and the remaining cases are progressing through the court systems.

We will not be pursing claims against the surgeons who implanted the Zimmer Durom hip systems because we believe the blame rests with the companies who have manufactured and marketed the implants and the best legal recourse is against these defendants.

We understand that you may be angry or disappointed in your treating surgeon. You may feel that your doctor should have known the implants would cause problems and therefore should not have recommended it to you. You may feel that your doctor was slow to respond to problems or didn’t appreciate your concerns about the symptoms you were experiencing.

Whilst these are very valid complaints, they alone do not amount to negligence on the surgeon’s part.

If the class action is successful you may be entitled to claim for pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life.

The amount you receive will depend on the severity of your injuries and whether your injuries are ongoing.

You may also be entitled to claim for economic loss (such as loss of wages or loss of earning capacity), domestic assistance, medical expenses and out of pocket expenses.

The class action will run on a No win no fee basis. Once we’ve established that you have a claim, we’ll handle the case on a No Win No Fee basis. What this means is that you will only ever pay our fee if your claim is successful.

Due to the nature of how class actions are run, some fees can be shared across the entire group of people who join the class action.

Where you are located isn’t necessarily a barrier when it comes to obtaining the services of a lawyer. Shine Lawyers have offices in the following locations, but as part of our service offering, home or hospital appointments can be arranged at your convenience.

Victoria

New South Wales

Queensland

Western Australia

Shine Lawyers have expert class action lawyers that can help you determine your right to compensation. The below links contain further information regarding your legal options.

Why choose Shine

Client stories

Our history

Meet the team

Shine Lawyers also have accredited specialists in personal injury law in:

Queensland

zimmer class action lawyers queensland

Jodie Willey, Brisbane
Kathryn Rayner, Townsville
Melissa O’Neill, Brisbane
Roger Singh, Brisbane
Simon Morrison, Brisbane

NSW
zimmer class action lawyers New South Wales

Ron Kramer, Fairfield
Susan Newman, Sydney

Latest from the blog

Silicosis: Government Urges Workers to Get Tested
September 24, 2018

Silicosis: Government Urges Workers to Get Tested

In the wake of the troubling resurgence of silicosis, Shine Lawyers has been spearheading the push for governments around Australia to recognise the dangers of benchtop cutting. (If you have been exposed to silicosis dust without proper protective equipment, regardless of how recently, submit your details to our Silicosis Exposure Register.) As a result of […]

Read more
A win for casual employees – Federal Court hand down decision
September 12, 2018

A win for casual employees – Federal Court hand down decision

In August of this year, the Full Federal Court handed down a decision in Workpac Pty Ltd v Skene [2018] FCAFC 131, which is a great win for casual employees in Australia. Following the landmark decision, ‘permanent casual’ employees may be eligible to claim those entitlements that arise out of a typical full-time employment relationship. […]

Read more
Does a “Peanutabout” solve the current trend of cycling accidents?
September 5, 2018

Does a “Peanutabout” solve the current trend of cycling accidents?

During an average week in Australia, about 3.74 million people ride a bike for transport or recreation. Those are the findings of the National Cycling Participation Survey 2017, with rates highest in the Northern Territory and the ACT (http://www.bicyclecouncil.com.au/publication/national-cycling-participation-survey-2017). Yet the road is all too often a dangerous place for cyclists. In 2017, ABC News […]

Read more
See more from the blog

Enquire now

Prolapse mesh class action

Prolapse mesh class action

If you are suffering complications due to a faulty mesh implant, you may be able to join a class action against the manufacturer and distributor of the product.

Read more
Featured lawyer: Rebecca Jancauskas

Featured lawyer: Rebecca Jancauskas

Rebecca Jancauskas is Special Counsel with over 10 years experience in plaintiff litigation. Leading our class action and environmental law teams, she is passionate about acting on behalf of individuals and communities who have been wronged.

Read more