In your state, you are required to confirm you wish to access this information. Please enter 'QLD' or 'WA' in the field below to continue.

No thanks

Royal Australia Air Force (RAAF) workers suffering cellular damage having worked with Jet Fuel

Some workers exposed to jet fuel within the RAAF have suffered damage to their body cells, which could have unknown long term consequences to their health. Research released under a Freedom of Information laws request has found that this link is “evidence of small but persistent cellular damage” Dr Ian Garden recently told the ABC.

The findings raise the possibility that a large number of defence workers may be entitled to seek chemical exposure compensation should their health deteriorate. Some RAAF workers who have experienced ill health have already come forward having been exposed to jet fuel on the infamous F-111 deseal/reseal project.

Cellular damage not confined to direct contact with fuel

The research project was led by Professor Francis Bowling of Brisbane’s Mater Hospital and set out to investigate why some of the workers on the deseal/reseal project suffered serious health impacts while others didn’t. These health impacts include depression, anxiety, memory loss, skin conditions, gastro-intestinal problems and an increased risk of cancer.

The research suggests jet fuel damages cells, and that the damage isn’t confined to areas of the body that come into direct contact with the fuel. It’s believed that the fuel components are transported to other organs around the body.

The research also suggested that those workers with inherited defects in their mitochondria might be at more risk than others.

Two maintenance workers on the deseal/reseal project who died of severe neurodegenerative disease were found after post-mortems to have such defects.

‘Malignant potential’ of cell damage

The report also suggests that it was possible some of the damaged cells to live on in the body with malignant potential, but that the long term effects at this stage were unknown.

Dr Gardner, who spoke to the ABC said “This study does not say jet fuel can cause malignancy, what it suggests is there are mechanisms that might be a possible explanation for cancers.”

The revelations that come out of the report are not only significant for the RAAF and it workers, past and present exposed to jet fuel, but also to other parts of the Defence Force that use similar fuels.

“The components of the fuel exhibiting toxicity are common to most fuels. Consideration should be given to further studies of workers exposed to fuel of any type,” the report said.

The ADF is now liaising with other industries, including the civil aviation industry, where workers might have been exposed to jet fuel.

Written by Shine Lawyers on . Last modified: September 21, 2017.

Join the discussion

Share this article:

  • KINGSLEY KRASCH wrote:

    I worked at Oakey, from 1989_1994.my principal job was to refuel all aircraft as well as de_fuel. We’re given gloves (far too large, or just. use barrier. cream)? You were there for sent for punishment where you would buy a loser pay and you would be in financial bad way sometimes the charges you up to $600 the gloves in the equipment will given we totally inadequate people had constant spills covered by myself was received extremely bad chemical Burns from the fuel systems icing inhibitor that is put into the aircraft aviation fuel you hold of refined kerosene we also had to drink contaminated contaminated water while we’re out bush that was brought from Oakey to Shoalwater trade paint automate training area because we would have been charged at a monetary taken from my pay which is a rather large amount we did could not go to the regimental aid post to see the doctor because you would have been charged for therefore we would tonight medical treatment I’m willing to put this on a stat deck and I also have medical files relating to my end duties received from chemical Burns from the fuel system asking inhibitor

    • Shine Lawyers wrote:

      Thanks for getting in contact Kingsley, and sorry to hear about your experience. We need a bit more information from you to help determine the best course of action. A member of our New Client Team will be able to gather more details, talk through the services we offer and let you know if we can help. You can find the contact details here: http://bit.ly/Shine-contact

  • William George Hatton wrote:

    l worked on the F1-11 as a welder for 4 years 9 months ,Standing Orders stated (1977) that welders, painters was to have 6 monthly blood test for heavy metals.
    The first test was positive for cadmium (>.05),on the
    return visit 6 month latter, l was informed by the nurse not to come back for any blood test.
    In 2007 l developed prostrate cancer,excised at
    Cabrini hospital Victoria.
    During my service life,l had exposure to an array of metals, chemicals (solvents).

    • Shine Lawyers wrote:

      Hi William, I’m sorry to hear about your experience. If you wanted to see if we can help with your situation, get in touch with our New Client Team. They will be able to gather more details, talk through the services we offer and let you know if we can assist. You can find the contact details here: http://bit.ly/Shine-contact

    Case study: $6.7m awarded to three workers harmed in explosion

    As reported in the Canberra Times on Thursday 2 October 2014, Cosmetic giant Revlon and the ACT government agreed to pay Mr Abraham Sumners and two other men compensation worth a cumulative $6.7 million over the blast at a medical waste disposal facility in 2009. The mothers of two of the men also received six-figure […]

    Read more

    Silicosis on the rise: The hidden dangers of engineered stone

    Historically, silicosis has been recognised as a dust disease affecting labourers from 40 to 50 years ago who worked closely with sandstone products. Unfortunately, this is no longer appears to be the case and many modern workers may be at risk. What is silicosis? Silicosis is a permanent and aggressive lung disease caused by breathing […]

    Read more

    Understanding the workers’ compensation changes in NSW

    Shine Lawyers’ NSW General Manager James Chrara unpacks section 39 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), and explains what it means for injured workers across the state.  Are your workers’ compensation weekly benefits being cut off? The NSW state government made a number of reforms to worker’s compensation in NSW in 2012. The reforms have resulted […]

    Read more

    Changes to NSW workers’ compensation: Will your benefits be cut?

    Have you recently received a letter from your workers’ compensation insurance company informing you that your weekly benefits will cease? If so, you may have been caught by section 39. In 2012, major amendments were introduced to the NSW workers’ compensation scheme – amendments that have resulted in ongoing instability for injured workers across the […]

    Read more

    Call Us Now

    Our friendly consultants are available to talk Monday to Friday, 8:15am to 6:00pm AEST.

    1800 618 851

    Live Chat

    Chat with Shine Lawyers through the livechat system without leaving your computer. No downloading, completely private and best of all - its easy to use.

    Start a live chat now

    Enquire Now

    Enquire now