Shine Lawyers have commenced Supreme Court proceedings against DPG Services Pty Ltd (Opal Aged Care) on behalf of close family members who suffered psychological injury when their parent, sibling or spouse was killed in/in consequence of the horrific fire at Quakers Hill Nursing Home on 18 November 2011.
The Deputy State Coroner H.C.B. Dillon by findings published after inquest into the Quakers Hill Nursing Home fire dated 9 March 2015 found that fourteen (14) residents had died as a direct or consequential result of the fire.
Who is a close family member
You are a close family member if you are:
(a) a parent of a deceased nursing home resident or other person with parental responsibility for a deceased resident, or
(b) the spouse or partner of a deceased nursing home resident, or
(c) a child or stepchild of a deceased nursing home resident or any other person for whom a deceased resident has parental responsibility, or
(d) a brother, sister, half-brother or half-sister, or stepbrother or stepsister of a deceased nursing home resident.
What is the basis of the action?
Our lead plaintiff alleges that the Opal Aged Care is liable in negligence, breach of contract and/or breach of the Australian Consumer Law by its conduct:
(a) employing registered nurse Roger Dean;
(b) failing to supervise Roger Dean;
(c) permitting Roger Dean to work unsupervised;
(d) allowing Roger Dean unrestricted access to the treatment room where Schedule 8 medication was stored;
(e) failing to exclude Roger Dean from the nursing home after 16 November 2011.
What does this mean for close family members of deceased residents?
Close family members who have suffered psychological injury will have an avenue in which to hold Opal Aged responsible for the loss and damage they have suffered. If you were a close family member of a deceased resident get in touch today.
Our offer to you
Latest from the blog
Silicosis: Government Urges Workers to Get Tested
In the wake of the troubling resurgence of silicosis, Shine Lawyers has been spearheading the push for governments around Australia to recognise the dangers of benchtop cutting. (If you have been exposed to silicosis dust without proper protective equipment, regardless of how recently, submit your details to our Silicosis Exposure Register.) As a result of […]Read more
A win for casual employees – Federal Court hand down decision
In August of this year, the Full Federal Court handed down a decision in Workpac Pty Ltd v Skene  FCAFC 131, which is a great win for casual employees in Australia. Following the landmark decision, ‘permanent casual’ employees may be eligible to claim those entitlements that arise out of a typical full-time employment relationship. […]Read more
Does a “Peanutabout” solve the current trend of cycling accidents?
During an average week in Australia, about 3.74 million people ride a bike for transport or recreation. Those are the findings of the National Cycling Participation Survey 2017, with rates highest in the Northern Territory and the ACT (http://www.bicyclecouncil.com.au/publication/national-cycling-participation-survey-2017). Yet the road is all too often a dangerous place for cyclists. In 2017, ABC News […]Read more