We think you are in Victoria. If not please click 'Change'

In your state, you are required to confirm you wish to access this information. Please enter 'QLD' or 'WA' in the field below to continue.

No thanks

Misleading and deceptive conduct explained

Fingers crossed behind back | Shine Lawyers

You might have come across the phrase ‘misleading or deceptive conduct’ before, and wondered what it meant in the legal world. The answer lies in section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law:

A person must not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive.

But where is the line drawn? When does advertising stop being merely creative and become deceptive? And what can you do if you have been led astray?

What is “conduct?”

Misleading and deceptive conduct is not limited to the supply of goods or services, but covers a wide range of business activities like advertisements and contractual arrangements. “Conduct” can also mean doing something or refusing to do something. It can include messages in advertisements, media statements, or even statements by an individual representing your business.

Was the conduct misleading or deceiving?

When deciding whether conduct falls fowl of section 18, the key question is whether an ordinary or reasonable person would have been misled or deceived by the statement.

According to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), it doesn’t matter if the person made the false or misleading statement intentionally or not. It is also irrelevant if  the person complaining was actually misled or deceived.

One example of false and misleading claims is if your business makes inaccurate statements about the quality of your products, or the benefits of your services.

Who can be liable under section 18?

An individual or a company can be pursued under section 18 for making misleading and deceptive statements. A person making misleading statements as a representative of a business can also be liable.

What remedies are available?

There are a few different outcomes for a successful claim under section 18. A person who makes a claim may recover the losses and damages they suffered as a result of the deceptive conduct. The company or individual may also be ordered to compensate the person who brought the claim.

Ultimately, as a consumer, you have a right not to be fed false, misleading or inaccurate information about the products, services or goods you are purchasing. If you have, the Australian Consumer Law is here to make sure those responsible for leading you astray are held to account.

Written by Shine Lawyers on . Last modified: September 6, 2017.

Join the discussion

Share this article:

  • Jonathon Wilson wrote:

    I will look into this .
    Deceptive Conduct .
    My instructions were NOT Followed.
    Deceived at mediation Settlement .

  • Audi, Skoda and Volkswagen Potential Class Action

    Shine Lawyers is examining claims against Audi, Skoda and Volkswagen following US class actions, alleging that several vehicles have a defective timing chain, which can cause catastrophic engine failure. Volkswagen, Skoda and Audi vehicles that contain 1.8L and 2.0L TSI and TFSI EA888 engines manufactured between 2008 and 2012 are the vehicles that have been […]

    Read more

    Shine lawyers warn Apple may face class action in Australia

    After investigating the matter carefully we have formed the view at this stage that consumers would not benefit from the commencement of any proceedings against Apple in respect of this matter. We will continue to monitor the position and if the situation changes we will notify via our website. Class Actions against technology juggernaut Apple […]

    Read more

    TGA’s mesh ban welcomed but needs to go further

    Mesh victims and participants in the Shine Lawyers Johnson & Johnson mesh class action have welcomed news that the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) will ban the use of vaginal mesh implants for pelvic prolapse in Australia after finding that the risks outweigh the benefits. The TGA announced the decision following a review of clinical evidence […]

    Read more