Are you in VIC? If not, please change below.

In your state, you are required to confirm you wish to access this information. Please enter 'QLD' or 'WA' in the field below to continue.

No thanks

Mining company illegally clears hundreds of trees on CQ grazing property

environmental lawyers | Shine Lawyers

Canadian-owned mining company, Goondicum Resources, may face charges after it admitted to bulldozing hundreds of trees without State approval. While Goondicum Resources had obtained permission to construct an access road between its Goondicum mine and Gladstone Port, the company proceeded to clear up to 900 metres of native bushland outside of the approved road reserve. Goondicum Resources’ managing director has now said that he hopes to gain the requisite State approval retrospectively.

Goondicum Resources runs an ilmenite mine located east of the township of Monto in Central Queensland. Although the breach primarily concerns State land, the mine is operating under a mining lease on a grazing property owned by Rob and Nadia Campbell. Despite the grazing property having been in Mr Campbell’s family for generations, Mr Campbell may not refuse the lease, and instead can only negotiate for compensation.

The Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (DEHP) has inspected the property following a complaint lodged by the Campbells who discovered dead wildlife amongst the bulldozed debris. The primary breach has been identified as the clearing of land without State approval 900 metres outside of the designated road reserve area. However, in light of the Campbell’s discovery, the DEHP has alluded that the impact of Goodicum Resource’s breach on both the flora and fauna in the area may amount to an act of Environmental Harm under Queensland’s Environmental Protection Act 1994. Importantly, the land cleared has previously been identified as core koala habitat and of State biodiversity significance. Accordingly, the DEHP are currently working with its Wildlife Management Unit to determine the scope of the impact.  Moreover, the DEHP has criticised Goondicum Resource’s failure to implement appropriate erosion and sediment controls along the road construction site. This discrepancy is to be the subject of serious consideration as the construction has occurred in both the Burnett River and Kolan River Catchments, which are deemed as ‘high value’ according to the Wide Bay Burnett Riverine Aquatic Conservation Assessment.

The managing director of Goondicum Resources, Mark McCauley, has conceded that the company “didn’t have the appropriate approval for the 900 metre realignment” and that instead of proceeding with the illegal land clearing, the company “should have waited for the approval, or put the road on the existing road reserve, or we should have obtained vegetation clearances”. In light of this admission, Mr McCauley is now seeking State approval retrospectively so that the construction of the access road may continue. However, Goodicum Resources has not admitted the same degree of liability in respect of the other identified impacts. Notably, in respect of the potential harm done to local wildlife, Goondicum Resources has defended itself by asserting that it had employed a professional spotter/catcher who worked closely with contractors to minimise any potential harm to local wildlife.  In addition, Mr McCauley went on to state that “we’ve got bulldozers clearing trees. I can’t guarantee that there [will] be nil impact on animal life”.

While many may applaud the DEHP’s response, it is still questionable as to why such breaches are being allowed to occur in the first place, and whether enforcement would have ensued had the DEHP not received the Campbell’s complaint. In April 2014, the Auditor General presented a report to the Queensland Parliament criticising the Queensland Government’s regulation of the resources industry, and thus protection of the environment.  Perhaps breaches such as that committed by Goondicum Resources is exactly what the Auditor General was referring to.


Written by 

Original image created by The boy that time forgot and issued under the GNU free documentation license.

Written by Shine Lawyers on . Last modified: July 13, 2017.

Join the discussion

Share this article:

There are 0 comments. Be the first!

Action filed for Oakey groundwater contamination

On 11 July 2017, Shine Lawyers‘ Class Action department launched a class action against the Department of Defence for exposing thousands of residents in the Queensland town of Oakey to toxic chemicals, which have spread into their land, water, food sources and bloodstreams. Oakey groundwater contamination More than 4,000 Oakey residents have been impacted by […]

Read more

What are landholder claims?

Landholder claims help landowners and workers protect their land and ensure adequate compensation when their land is disturbed. Causes of disturbances can include flooding, new energy and mining projects, introduction of pests, contamination and more. Cases often end up at a negotiation stage, where parties come to an agreement on the level of compensation. A number […]

Read more

Erin Brockovich shining a light on contamination

Residents in the rural Queensland town of Oakey have been battling the Department of Defence Force over a water contamination issue that is affecting their crops, livestock, property prices and potentially their heath. Chemicals used in firefighting activities at the nearby Army Aviation Centre have leached into ground water and contaminated the surrounding areas, including […]

Read more

Oakey Investigation: Defence slow to address concerns

The Oakey Contamination Investigation is looking into groundwater contamination in the Queensland town of Oakey. Potentially hazardous chemicals penetrated the soil in the surrounding areas of the Army Aviation Centre Oakey. The chemical compounds known as PFOS and PFOA, were key fire-fighting elements in the foam used by Defence personnel to mitigate blazes. The residue […]

Read more