Are you in VIC? If not, please change below.

In your state, you are required to confirm you wish to access this information. Please enter 'QLD' or 'WA' in the field below to continue.

No thanks

Child abuse and time limitations: A second class of survivors

Sad boy in a park | Shine Lawyers

Lisa Flynn | Shine Lawyers Written by:
Lisa Flynn
National Special Counsel - Abuse Law

For decades, Shine Lawyers has fought to achieve justice for survivors and victims of abuse.

Institutions and perpetrators have been asked to account for the horrifying actions of depraved individuals and the flawed systems that did not care enough to protect children under their responsibility.

We’ve lobbied governments to improve our country’s laws, seeking accountability for those who do wrong and better support for those who are wronged. We’ve implored our leaders to remove some of the significant hurdles facing survivors of abuse who embark on this quest for justice.

Time limitations – a barrier to justice

One of these hurdles, which has been a barrier for many survivors of abuse, is the imposition of time limitations. Time and time again, survivors’ efforts to be heard and have their defendants held to account are thwarted at the first hurdle – their claims are out of time.

Thanks to the recommendations of the current Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Abuse, and to the passionate voices of many, this barrier has been removed – but only for some survivors of abuse.

depressed-teenager-in-tunnel

Different states, different standards

The disappointing fact is that due to the current situation in Australia, an individual’s ability to recover compensation and hold the perpetrator accountable will depend on what state the child abuse occurred in.

  • New South Wales and Victoria – Claims can now be brought against the institution and / or perpetrator responsible, regardless of time. These states were the first to enact legislation reflecting the recommendations of the Royal Commission to remove limitation periods for those who have suffered abuse as a child.
  • Queensland – Claims can also be lodged without fear of the limitation period, but only if the abuse was sexual, not physical or psychological. This leads to the absurd situation where a person could bring a claim for sexual abuse, but not any physical abuse inflicted at the same time. How does one determine what damage was caused by the sexual assault, as opposed to the physical abuse, where both were part of the same attack?
  • Australian Capital Territory – Compensation may be available if the abuse was suffered as a child, but only if this occurred in an institution. This means a boy sexually abused in a Catholic Church could bring a claim even if the abuse happened 20 years ago. A girl abused by her foster father could not, solely because the law dictates her claim is out of time. This is how the ACT government has created a second class category of abuse survivor.

Despite these flaws, Queensland and ACT governments have at least taken some steps to address the time limitation issue.  Other State governments are still to legislate to remove the time limitation defence for any survivors of abuse (Tasmania, Northern Territory, Western Australia and South Australia). The Royal Commission’s recommendations were handed down nearly two years ago, and these states have some serious catching up to do.

The time for change is now

The survivors I act for every day have a message for these governments – act now.

We don’t need further consultation, discussion or talk of the need for progress. Survivors of abuse need change, and we need it now. The work has already been done. The discussions and consultations have been had. The recommendations have been heard and other state governments have made the change.

It is time to act quickly and compassionately. It is incredibly important that these States adopt best practice and do not create legislation that creates a second class of survivors. Why should survivors who suffered abuse within an institutional context be entitled to bring a claim for damages, yet someone who was abused in a familial context not be? Why should someone who has suffered their whole life due to horrific physical and emotional abuse not have the same rights as someone who suffered the same effects from sexual abuse?

Survivors of child abuse have already suffered more than anyone should ever have to. Why can’t we, as a civilised society, make things easier for them now?

Get in touch

If you or a loved one has suffered abuse, you may be entitled to bring a legal claim to access justice and acknowledgement for the wrongdoing suffered. For more information and to get in touch, contact our team of abuse law experts today.

Written by Lisa Flynn on . Last modified: September 15, 2017.

Join the discussion

Share this article:

  • Tracy Poulter wrote:

    I hope the laws change without to much more pain for the Abused people as I was 6 me months past the law allows and got told to bad I was abused as a child with family and I was also raped in my 30’s and it was mentally and physically strained to both me and my partner it’s was also violent to us both and I have to look at the damage that the violence Caused and my ex partner was a broken man for a long time and it ended our relationship in the end

    • Shine Lawyers wrote:

      We hope so too Tracy and are sorry to hear about your experience. If you would like, one of our abuse experts can contact you to discuss your situation and if we can help. You just need to private message our Facebook page with your preferred contact method I’ll follow this up for you.

  • Donna wrote:

    Wow…about time…the mormon church hid the fact that my step father sexually abused me…so much so that they stripped him of membership in a meeting…and sacked him from his paid employment there,,,it was made worse as Qld police officers sat on the church board who dismissed him…and of course didn’t act in my best interests…they covered up the acts to protect church image…he got sent to prison due to abuse over two states QLD and NSW…yet funnily enough no one seems to want to touch the Mormon church…it seems their chequebook knows no bounds!!

  • Wayne wrote:

    I don’t understand why my daughter suffered all forms of abuse while living with her now deceased mother and stepfather and my daughter was known to DOCS NSW with 17+ reports but was left with them. I claimed compensation from NSW Victim Services but am told that you cannot sue Docs for leaving her there. Infuriating!!

  • How to Seek Help: For People in Abusive Relationships

    “Why didn’t you just leave?” is a question often posed to survivors of abusive relationships and domestic violence. But the situation is often more complicated than that. There are many reasons that make it hard to leave abusive relationships, however there are steps you can begin to take to make the process easier. It might seem like […]

    Read more

    Yesterday was a good day for abuse survivors

    Working with survivors of abuse every day and hearing the horrific nature of the abuse inflicted on them as small vulnerable children, and of the devastating impact the abuse has had on their lives, not every day is an easy one. However, there were a few news stories that popped into my consciousness yesterday that […]

    Read more